Scientific references
A curated set of peer-reviewed publications relevant to personalized nutrition, microbiome-informed recommendations, and validated analysis standards (16S V3/V4, shotgun metagenomics, SILVA, MetaCyc).
Academic context (Maastricht University)
InnerBuddies’ scope aligns with established academic research in microbiome science and nutritional interventions, including Maastricht University-linked publications (e.g., work involving Prof. Koen Venema who is involved directly with InnerBuddies). Explore UM research output via Maastricht University CRIS .
Personalized nutrition vs. generic advice Evidence that tailored guidance can improve dietary behaviour and outcomes.
- Celis-Morales et al. (Food4Me). Personalized nutrition improves diet and health-related outcomes (International Journal of Epidemiology, 2017).
- Livingstone et al. (Food4Me). Internet-based personalized nutrition drives behaviour change (American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2016).
- Berry et al. (PREDICT 1). Inter-individual variability supports precision nutrition (Nature Medicine, 2020).
Microbiome-informed personalization Evidence that gut microbiome features can help explain or predict individual responses.
Validated methods and reference databases Peer-reviewed standards (utilized by InnerBuddies) underpinning 16S V3/V4, shotgun metagenomics, SILVA taxonomy, and MetaCyc pathways.
- Klindworth et al. 16S rRNA primer evaluation incl. V3/V4 performance considerations (Nucleic Acids Research, 2013).
- Quast et al. SILVA rRNA gene database for taxonomic annotation (Nucleic Acids Research, 2013).
- Caspi et al. MetaCyc curated metabolic pathways database (Nucleic Acids Research, 2020).
- Quince et al. Shotgun metagenomics: from sampling to analysis best practices (Nature Biotechnology, 2017).
- Martina et al. (UM-linked; incl. Prof. Koen Venema). Nutrition intervention effects measured in TIM-2 (Beneficial Microbes, 2019).